Malta’s government is considered to be a democratic republic, but don’t confuse the word democracy for freedom. According to a recent report by Freedom House, a non-governmental organization, freedom of the press has diminished in this tiny island nation over the past few years.
Though the country’s Constitution guarantees freedom of speech and of the press, the government is allowed to restrict these rights under a variety of circumstances. Apparently, Malta is one of three European Union member states not to have freedom of information legislation.
The government controls several domestic radio stations as well as the only national television broadcaster, TVM. Despite restricting access to independent news sources, Malta’s government does not block internet access.
Over the past year, Malta has seen a series of threats and attacks against journalists reporting on public demonstrations and debates. Police are currently investigating an arson attack against a journalist and editor who were covering issues of immigration, racism and intolerance towards immigrants. The Maltese Broadcasting Authority, in another example of restrictive policies, sued an independent television station for broadcasting material that could incite racial hatred.
Last week, Prime Minister Lawrence Gonzi announced the approval of a draft freedom of information act, which is expected to be presented to the legislature at the formal start of the body’s new session.
I am surprised the European Union allows member governments to restrict freedom of the press and speech without penalty. I believe countries have the right to set their own policies, as long as they allow for basic freedoms. At least Malta finally seems ready to alter an antiquated policy.
Reference
Zahra, Charlot. “Malta enjoying fewer press freedoms.” Malta Today. May 11, 2008.